/ Friday June 24, 2022It made me a little creepy to see the criticism directed against the film Lightyear (2022, Angus McLane), especially coming from good consciences whom we all believed were silenced after the achievements of the LGBTIQ+ community.No. Good consciences are in perfect health.Many have decided, not me, to let them pass.It is not recommended.They have correctly grounded their arrests, which are not ideal.Moms and dads of traditional excesses tear their clothes for the kiss of a homoparental couple that appears in the aforementioned film.Priests of all cults... excuse me, from their pulpits they see hilarious, I suppose, fighting their battles to those gentlemen and ladies of civil society.It is the most comfortable part of all this optional framework.Intolerance was never seen more reflected, although I'm a little out of my mouth about it because they still haven't taken up arms to go out and kill blacks, invalids, gays.They lack little, yes.For now, Buzz Ligthyear is in the fray, that nice character, the son of another story, starring in this one that gave more to talk about than his predecessors.Many of the good consciences have not seen it.They speak by hearsay.We look for chicharrón noise when we know that he is going to do it.Lightyear happens to be that high point with which Disney fights a war against good consciences that he himself started.Because that's the funny thing about this moment.Walt Disney, the creator of the radical, retrograde monster, a good conscience himself, offers a benevolent, serious, spirited, unitary, inclusive face when he has Canned Song of the South (1946, Wilfred Jackson).Today, seeing that most viewers are inclusive and benevolent, anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-solemn, he offers them a sandwich to calm down and go to the movies or pay for the preview on any platform.In other words, Disney's attitude is not gratuitous.He never has been.I want to bring to mind that almost documentary film called The Fight for Citizen Kane (1996, Michael Epstein, Thomas Lennon) where we see the other story of this controversial film, this one by Orson Welles.In it, the entire Hollywood producers come together to discuss how to appease newspaper mogul Howard Hughes who is furious that Orson Welles's film harasses him, insults him, exhibits him.The newspaper mogul throws his surreptitious entertainment columnist Louella Parsons with the threat.If they release Citizen Kane (1941) the newspaper will bring to light the irregularities of the actors.Drugs, alcohol, homosexuality (masculine, at that time lesbianism was such an aberrant thing that no one wanted to certify its existence) all the perversions of those gods called actors were going to be exhibited badly.One of the attendees at this meeting turns to see Disney telling him that he was the only one who did not have to worry.Don't believe, replies Disney, Snow White lives with seven deformed men.Does she notice, kind artilugist who reads me?Disney himself knew that his tapes, mistakenly received by a child audience, were channels of perverse desires, criminal symptoms, sexual obsessions.Mickey Mouse keeps an asexuality that made Mimi appear so that no one would gossip about the little mouse.Donald doesn't have that problem because, by walking without pants, we understand that his sexuality is different.The barrage of heroines that have appeared for a long time in Pixar films, I am thinking of Merida, Elsa, Ana, Moana and the latest Mirabel, who undoes a charm with her own qualities, is the battering ram with which Disney was already seeking the favor of inclusive, open minds, millenarians who would look favorably on women, all princesses, empowered, strong, who took the course of events in their hands.See if not Ralph WiFi (2018, Rich Moore, Phil Johnston) where the princesses put on their pants, literally, to help the strong Ralph.That audience was won in a curious but interesting fight.However, companies like Disney do not want just one thing.They want the full loot that implies that they must sell the inclusive, tenacious, brave illusion with which they fight against good consciences.Lightyear is the result of this marketing survey.Or what?Did you really think, dear artilugist, that finally Disney would undo a wrong that was not the money?I'm sorry to tell you.Lightyear is made for the economy, not for world peace.That must be left to the UN.In this world in which the LGBTIQ+ attitude permeates a new way of living, of being, of supporting, of correcting the evil hobbies of the past, a film like the one we are dealing with is the one that should be the spearhead.However, that good consciences, busy with the orderly realization of their offspring, see insanely that two women kiss in front of their little daughter, adopted because two women cannot procreate a woman, that is known, has perforated their little brain eager for incense, for prayer, for inherent evil.That is unnatural they cry exalted.It is criminal say others.It is an aberration, those who are just beginning to read the Bible.The truth is that, as a very dear friend says, the only ones who want to get married these days are members of the LGBT community... Heterosexuals don't want to make commitments.They want to see what it is about without being tied down, without creating more of a bond than what sex allows.That is not unnatural or criminal or aberrant.It's just, that's how the youth of these times is, I heard one of those good consciences say who was analyzing who to burn, if the director, if Pixar or Buzz Ligthyear.The graceful concession of the legalization of homoparental marriage is nothing more than an electoral strategy, in the same way that Disney's strategy is to bring closer that public that previously branded it retrograde, bland, geek among other twists and turns.Is Disney going to become a champion of the good guys, the real ones, with this tape?Or it will be pure smoke, pure cinephile dyslexia.Time will tell.The problem is that, if the reasons of good consciences are the unnatural, we cannot trust their proposal of a healthy, correct marriage either.At some point the itch of the seventh year will come, recalling another famous film, in which well-matched couples, boy and girl, will separate, each one will go their own way and thus the children of such a marriage will grow up without parental images, without who guides them in love and sex when the time comes.That's more natural, right?More correct.Let's not talk about the united couples who take drugs, drink alcohol, mistreat their children in the heat of drugs.That's better, right?The heterosexual couple stays together.Never mind your alterations of hysteria.And since this contraption is becoming more like a red note, we'd better leave it there.It made me a little creepy to see the criticism directed against the film Lightyear (2022, Angus McLane), especially coming from good consciences whom we all believed were silenced after the achievements of the LGBTIQ+ community.No. Good consciences are in perfect health.Many have decided, not me, to let them pass.It is not recommended.They have correctly grounded their arrests, which are not ideal.Moms and dads of traditional excesses tear their clothes for the kiss of a homoparental couple that appears in the aforementioned film.Priests of all cults... excuse me, from their pulpits they see hilarious, I suppose, fighting their battles to those gentlemen and ladies of civil society.It is the most comfortable part of all this optional framework.Intolerance was never seen more reflected, although I'm a little out of my mouth about it because they still haven't taken up arms to go out and kill blacks, invalids, gays.They lack little, yes.For now, Buzz Ligthyear is in the fray, that nice character, the son of another story, starring in this one that gave more to talk about than his predecessors.Many of the good consciences have not seen it.They speak by hearsay.We look for chicharrón noise when we know that he is going to do it.Lightyear happens to be that high point with which Disney fights a war against good consciences that he himself started.Because that's the funny thing about this moment.Walt Disney, the creator of the radical, retrograde monster, a good conscience himself, offers a benevolent, serious, spirited, unitary, inclusive face when he has Canned Song of the South (1946, Wilfred Jackson).Today, seeing that most viewers are inclusive and benevolent, anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-solemn, he offers them a sandwich to calm down and go to the movies or pay for the preview on any platform.In other words, Disney's attitude is not gratuitous.He never has been.I want to bring to mind that almost documentary film called The Fight for Citizen Kane (1996, Michael Epstein, Thomas Lennon) where we see the other story of this controversial film, this one by Orson Welles.In it, the entire Hollywood producers come together to discuss how to appease newspaper mogul Howard Hughes who is furious that Orson Welles's film harasses him, insults him, exhibits him.The newspaper mogul throws his surreptitious entertainment columnist Louella Parsons with the threat.If they release Citizen Kane (1941) the newspaper will bring to light the irregularities of the actors.Drugs, alcohol, homosexuality (masculine, at that time lesbianism was such an aberrant thing that no one wanted to certify its existence) all the perversions of those gods called actors were going to be exhibited badly.One of the attendees at this meeting turns to see Disney telling him that he was the only one who did not have to worry.Don't believe, replies Disney, Snow White lives with seven deformed men.Does she notice, kind artilugist who reads me?Disney himself knew that his tapes, mistakenly received by a child audience, were channels of perverse desires, criminal symptoms, sexual obsessions.Mickey Mouse keeps an asexuality that made Mimi appear so that no one would gossip about the little mouse.Donald doesn't have that problem because, by walking without pants, we understand that his sexuality is different.The barrage of heroines that have appeared for a long time in Pixar films, I am thinking of Merida, Elsa, Ana, Moana and the latest Mirabel, who undoes a charm with her own qualities, is the battering ram with which Disney was already seeking the favor of inclusive, open minds, millenarians who would look favorably on women, all princesses, empowered, strong, who took the course of events in their hands.See if not Ralph WiFi (2018, Rich Moore, Phil Johnston) where the princesses put on their pants, literally, to help the strong Ralph.That audience was won in a curious but interesting fight.However, companies like Disney do not want just one thing.They want the full loot that implies that they must sell the inclusive, tenacious, brave illusion with which they fight against good consciences.Lightyear is the result of this marketing survey.Or what?Did you really think, dear artilugist, that finally Disney would undo a wrong that was not the money?I'm sorry to tell you.Lightyear is made for the economy, not for world peace.That must be left to the UN.In this world in which the LGBTIQ+ attitude permeates a new way of living, of being, of supporting, of correcting the evil hobbies of the past, a film like the one we are dealing with is the one that should be the spearhead.However, that good consciences, busy with the orderly realization of their offspring, see insanely that two women kiss in front of their little daughter, adopted because two women cannot procreate a woman, that is known, has perforated their little brain eager for incense, for prayer, for inherent evil.That is unnatural they cry exalted.It is criminal say others.It is an aberration, those who are just beginning to read the Bible.The truth is that, as a very dear friend says, the only ones who want to get married these days are members of the LGBT community... Heterosexuals don't want to make commitments.They want to see what it is about without being tied down, without creating more of a bond than what sex allows.That is not unnatural or criminal or aberrant.It's just, that's how the youth of these times is, I heard one of those good consciences say who was analyzing who to burn, if the director, if Pixar or Buzz Ligthyear.The graceful concession of the legalization of homoparental marriage is nothing more than an electoral strategy, in the same way that Disney's strategy is to bring closer that public that previously branded it retrograde, bland, geek among other twists and turns.Is Disney going to become a champion of the good guys, the real ones, with this tape?Or it will be pure smoke, pure cinephile dyslexia.Time will tell.The problem is that, if the reasons of good consciences are the unnatural, we cannot trust their proposal of a healthy, correct marriage either.At some point the itch of the seventh year will come, recalling another famous film, in which well-matched couples, boy and girl, will separate, each one will go their own way and thus the children of such a marriage will grow up without parental images, without who guides them in love and sex when the time comes.That's more natural, right?More correct.Let's not talk about the united couples who take drugs, drink alcohol, mistreat their children in the heat of drugs.That's better, right?The heterosexual couple stays together.Never mind your alterations of hysteria.And since this contraption is becoming more like a red note, we'd better leave it there.Javier Marin HernandezLeon Gutierrez Ferretis